eugenebastonbw wrote: > --- In [email protected], Michael Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Hi Eugene >> >> I a little confused by all this, would the vacant moorings that are >> going to be tendered to the highest bidder normally have gone to > those >> highest on the waiting list for moorings? >> > Yes Michael. Of course, if someone is top of the list with a boat > larger than the space available, it will go to the next on the list, > and so on, until the mooring is let for one year. > > Waiting lists will be suspended for the duration of the trial, and the > successful tender will secure the mooring for a three year period, > instead of one year as above.
Hi Eugene Thanks for the clarification. To put it bluntly, it seems that BW are allowing those with more money than sense to jump over the waiting list and if I was on the waiting list, then I would be more than a little annoyed with BW. Surely it would have been better, or even morally better, to freeze the waiting list (not to add any more names) and then wait until all those on the list had been satisfied and then run the trial. This may not be an ideal approach but far less contentious than what has already been formulated. -- Regards Michael Clarke Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.petroleumblownaparte.eu/
