-- Original Message --
From: Bru Peckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sorry to bang on about this but that doesn't jive
>> with Bob's post does it? That's why I'm not satisified
>> with the explanations so far. Either the list is un-
>> moderated or it isn't (with the aforementioned accepted
>> exception of first post moderation to trap spammers).
Whatever it is I'm happy with the way the list is run. Though it's not always
the place it was, and indeed neither are the waterways {:>(
I'm not giving up on either just yet.
and then George's bit -
>>> We now return to our regularly scheduled programming,
>>> already inprogress
Bruce again -
>> One certainly hopes so but I for one do not
>> feel inclined to dismiss this issue so lightly. It
>> seems to be a fundamental shift in the way the
>> list is managed.
Well it's a free world and you can choose, Bruce.
Beeky
___________________________________
thorNET, http://www.thornet.co.uk
