simon hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >BW has told me that it informed all those on the towpath moorings it >would not be renewing (I believe all those moorings were on one-year >terms, and that BW had the right not to renew them) at Sawley and >Beeston that moorings would be available at Pillings.
>Pillings Marina is 30 miles away ! If you are not residential, and the replacement is within an hour's land travel, that sounds quite reasonable to me. You were expecting a replacement around the corner? >The cost of mooring there would be double what I am paying here ! You were expecting to continue paying BW's under-market towpath moorings rent indefinitely? Sounds like you *were* informed of Pillings (BW insists that all in your situation were), but turned your nose up at it? You had no right to stay on your mooring after expiry, no right to any replacement, and no right to a fixed rent, yet you still complained when an alternative was helpfully identified? >I'm sorry mate all your comments do is prove how full of S#!t you actually are >! Translation: "I dislike being challenged, so I shall be abusive." >I think this will be the end of the subject ! I'm not surprised. >All I was doing in my original post was to spread some good news through the >boating community ! Good news for you, perhaps; bad news for many other boaters. >I expect you have similar views with respect of the Save our Waterways " >campaign ? I don't see the relevance, but, since you ask, my view of SOW is: I hope it may provide worthwhile competition for other waterways organisations that seem to have become, er, less effective of late. I have some doubts about the approach, but I applaud the effort. >There are plenty of decent boaters out there we don't need the likes of you ! To what group does the "we" in that sentence refer? Adrian Adrian Stott 07956-299966
