Barry wrote: > I'm shocked! :-)) & *currently* can only see one spelling mistake in your reply:-))
Dammit, I suppose that you're going to say that my posting was 'fundamentally' flawed? You could have taken the posting in the 'positive' spirit in which it was sent, but instead you've looked on the 'negative' side. My 'potential' can only improve, providing I don't get attacked in a verbal form of assault and 'battery'. I shall persist in 'charging' ahead with my postings unless there is a re'volt' which would inevitably h'amp'er my efforts. So, having explained my position, I'll 'sine' off with a 'wave' ;-)) Roger
