But the whole point of the original comment on the Fazely mob (not by me) was that they don't reply to comments and certainly do nowt about 'em. Maybe you could stir them up sir.
--- On Wed, 7/9/08, Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [canals-list] Re: Speeding - caught on camera? To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 10:25 AM David Cragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: >One must realise that the Fazeley mob are much more interested in spending a >fortune dumping weeds on the towpath side of their canals rather than >spending money replying to us lot. > > I see their narrowed bits on the S&W (dredged two year back and dumped behind >soft edging offside) are silted already. We were told by one chap (surveying) >that his firm has a contract for more 'temporary' soft edging near Compton. Quite apart from being daft, this is a direct violation of policy BW agreed with users nationally, which is that when dredging is done it will *always* be to the original profile (unless this would make the waterway unstable, or is contrary to statute such as in SSSIs). If money is short, then the length to be dredged should be reduced. The profile never should be. Take the BW manager to task! Adrian . Adrian Stott 07956-299966 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
