"rb999sb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--- In [email protected], Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What is being proposed is a fee that varies with your cruising >range, >> i.e. how many km of waterway you can access from your home mooring. >> >Interesting if your home mooring isn't on BW waters. No problem. You would still pay BW for all of its waters that you could cruise to from there. Especially no problem if this way of charging spread across all the waterways (i.e. those run by other authorities than BW too), as the complete (physical) cruising range could then be used in the charge calculation. >A long term mooring is no use to a CCer as it would get hardly any use. >It would just create an artificial shortage of moorings and drive the >cost of moorings up. True. But it is of use to the continuous moorers, and it is those that I think would get one (and a conventional licence) if all CCers paid a mooring component in their charges Adrian . Adrian Stott 07956-299966
