Allan Cazaly wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > As promised, I have now got the answer you enquired about from > *FUELOCK*. It is, as I thought, an insurance requirement. Their answer > was so complete, I am copying it below: > > ***COPIED*** > Wow, an order already - that's a fab start. > > The enquirer is correct, our website does indeed include those words, > and I really wish it didn't need to do so. They are there, and only > there at the insistance of our insurers who felt it needed to be covered. > > We have had Fuelock extensively tested, both in lab and in situ and we > have never found any issue with water leaking into fuel tanks and > contaminating fuels. I can personally vouch for fact that I spent > three weeks in gales and teeming rain around Hebrides in summer and no > leakage was reported. Since Fuelock launched four months ago we have > more than doubled our expected ANNUAL sales and have not had a single > report of water leakage. I think our insurers, like all insurers are > being ultra cautious and would say that nothing is ever guaranteed to > be 100% watertight, but our experience has shown that water leakage is > simply not an issue. > > Hope this helps? > ***END OF COPY** > > There! That says it all! > Regards, ~Allan~ > PS: I will be writing on *Fuelock* in January, on my web blog page. > This can be accessed by going to < www dot pengalanty dot com > if you > are interested. > > --- In [email protected], Andrew J Instone-Cowie > <and...@...> wrote: >> Their website says: "ONLY use Fuelock on vessels fitted with water >> separators before the engine filters." Is that code for "by the way, it >> leaks"?? >> >> Andrew >> (Allan's reply - A DEFINATE NO!)
My reply was intended to be slightly tongue in cheek! You have mail. Regards Andrew
