> >> Don't want to put you to any trouble John, but we'll read almost anything > >> canal-related. Especially if we are headed in the same direction. > >> > >> Beeky > >> > > Do you want to send an address for an off list reply and I'll get > > something ready tomorrow. > > John > > > What's wrong with a good old trip report on here so we can all enjoy > it. > IIRC the brief negative debate on trip reports last year was resoundingly shouted down so I know no reason why not - it won't be very detailed as I'm not a logkeeper but I'll certainly recall my mistakes on the river to help others avoid them! Will get on with it tomorrow. John
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Re: WInsford... Steve Haywood
- [canals-list] Re: Re: Re: WIn... Neil Arlidge
- [canals-list] Re: WInsford Fl... Roger Millin
- Re: [canals-list] Re: WInsford Flash -... Keir Gale
- [canals-list] Was WInsford Flash ... Richard Tanner
- [canals-list] Re: Re: WInsford Flash - wel... Neil Arlidge
- [canals-list] Re: Winsford Flash - and the... jhar1945
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Winsford Flash -... captain . beeky
- [canals-list] Re: Winsford Flash -... jhar1945
- [canals-list] Re: Winsford Fl... Brian on Harnser
- [canals-list] Re: Winsfor... jhar1945
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Win... John
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Win... Richard Tanner
- [canals-list] Re: Winsfor... John Slee
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Win... captain . beeky
- [canals-list] Re: Winsfor... Allan Cazaly
- Re: [canals-list] Re: WInsford Flash - welcome... Andrew J Instone-Cowie
- [canals-list] Re: Re: WInsford Flash - wel... Neil Arlidge
- Re: [canals-list] Re: Re: WInsford Fla... Andrew J Instone-Cowie
- [canals-list] Re: Re: Re: WInsford... Neil Arlidge
- RE: [canals-list] WInsford Flash - welcome party Trevor
