I notice a vote about certain moorings used by CC to the exclusion of others found a 2 to 1 split against the CCs. But there was a hard core who thought it was OK to block virtually the only good moorings on a canal as it is their right. (one gained the impression that the most vocal of these are not usually found in the area concerned given their suggestions. Still I note they back up the trend of more and more of these blokes around on prime overnight moorings and given the attitude of some can imagine BW not fighting to get rid of them being more lightly to give them gipsy status and free mooring.r
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, Bruce Napier <[email protected]> wrote: From: Bruce Napier <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [canals-list] CCs officially "travellers"? To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, 2 February, 2010, 11:00 On 2 Feb 2010, at 10:51, Bruce Napier wrote: > Does this mean dedicated 14 day moorings? Don't tell me, we'd have to > pay a premium on the licence to get it :-{{ Replying my own post; there's a brief discussion on CW here: http://www.canalworld.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=28054 which implies probably not. Seems like the ruling was stimulated by the BW moorings con(sultation). 末 All the best Bruce Follow the building of Sanity Again at http://sanityagain.blogspot.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
