>
>
> His ex-Chairmanship spake thus:
>> Nice looking Hudson on the left.
>> Hope to get mine out on Wednesday for a few days. It's been that long, I
>> need a course on start up!
>
From: "roger_millin" <[email protected]>
> Are you sure Andrew? That was my thought on first looking at the picture
> but now I'm not so sure. It doesn't seem to have the Hudson double dip of
> the fore deck gunwales and bow gunwales, it has a rounded stem post
> instead of the Hudson flat and the gunwales are narrower than normal for a
> Hudson. As it doesn't seem to be a Hudson then I will admit that it
> doesn't look too bad for something that isn't a Norton Canes! ;-))))
> Roger
Not positive no, so if not a Hudson, a what? I was going by the lamp on the
front that Hudson always fits, and most people soon replace.
Regards
Andrew
