Has his conversation now reduced into a debate about why we have DNS records? On 5 Oct 2013 22:28, "Michał Sawicz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05.10.2013 23:21, Stéphane Graber wrote: > >> I apparently can't access those bugs so can't really see what you >> reported, note that for the case of snakefruit and nusakan, a DNS record >> wouldn't have helped since it's the IS maintained firewalls that are the >> main problem (those machines have very restricted network access so any >> change in IP address needs to be coordinated with IS so that the >> firewalls can be updated). >> > > They're private, I've subscribed you to the first one. And I understand > the problem with accessing one from the other - and it's not about that. > It's about being able to reference and access those services by name, and > not just by IP, so that we can move the name in case of such migrations, > instead of having to update the IPs everywhere they've been stored by now, > and just letting people know the new IP address and asking them to remember > it "locally". > > -- > Michał (Saviq) Sawicz <[email protected]> > Canonical Services Ltd. > > -- > Ubuntu-engineering mailing list > Ubuntu-engineering@lists.**canonical.com<[email protected]> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.canonical.com/** > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**engineering<https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-engineering> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
