Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Johnston <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Right, >> >> instead of touch_mir, call the saucy-proposed channel one "touch_saucy". > > > Calling it touch_saucy is somewhat redundant. The naming scheme will already > make it show up on the Saucy page of the dashboard, so it would be similar > to calling it saucy-saucy. OK, then lets stick with touch and have both saucy as well as trusty builds show up there. >> >> >> For now lets run default, install-on-boot and unity8 for touch_sf4p. >> >> Also would be good if we rename touch_mir -> to touch (tracking >> devel-proposed) instead of creating a new test so we dont loose >> history. >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Paul Larson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi Alex, following on to our discussion in IRC, I wanted to make sure >> > everyone was in agreement with what we're proposing to do for saucy and >> > trusty touch jobs going forward. >> > >> > == Current jobs we were running on Saucy == >> > touch_mir >> > touch_ro (better described as surfaceflinger jobs, but renames are hard >> > on >> > the dashboard side) >> > touch_custom >> > >> > == Proposed new jobs on Saucy == >> > touch_mir - saucy-proposed channel, we'd like to keep the same name just >> > on >> > Saucy if at all possible >> > >> > == Proposed new jobs on Trusty == >> > touch - Full run of tests on devel-proposed >> > touch_sf4p - minimal run of TBD tests only on devel-proposed with mir >> > turned >> > off >> > touch_custom - minimal run of the same tests we run now on custom jobs, >> > but >> > on trusty >> > >> > Andy, Joseph and I just had a hangout to sort out some of the technical >> > details of what will be needed to do this, but we'd like to get >> > confirmation >> > that this is what you're expecting. The other thing I want to clarify, >> > is >> > which devices we run on. When we first started discussing whether to run >> > on >> > sf on irc, Ricardo was suggesting to just do it for tablets, but I think >> > you >> > are saying to do it on phones. Do we run everything on phones only >> > still? >> > Do we need to add the tablets in for some tests again now? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Paul Larson >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > Chris Johnston <[email protected]> > Software Engineer - Canonical Ltd. > www.ubuntu.com -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
