That would have been my recommendation. Thanks. Francis
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/05/2013 11:49 AM, Paul Larson wrote: >> >> Does that sound reasonable to everyone? This would do 2 things for us: >> 1. builds happening as part of the upstream testing process wouldn't >> impact touch jobs on smoke testing >> >> 2. adbd issues would be slightly more isolated, and not require >> restarting adb for the world if we hit them >> >> Anyone have issues with this? Would this mess up any of your stuff Andy? > > > +1 > > Shouldn't hurt me. Probably just need to tweak a config or 2. > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Francis Ginther Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
