Hey,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Celso Providelo < [email protected]> wrote: <massive snip> > > Yes, it is a cheat. Stakeholders do not care about *the code*, it's just > our 'instrument' to provide them value. Strictly speaking we should only > care about *the code* when it is affecting the how we deliver value, either > reducing our velocity (which is your _valid_ point) or prevent us to solve > problems. > > <massive snip> > CI-CD (highly automated, instrumented and monitored production > environment) is a very important aspect of the way we intend to deliver and > maintain solutions and was entirely overlooked for one and half sprint. > > It seems to me that our stakeholders really don't care about CI/CD either, right? Surely they'd be perfectly happy if we had to manually deploy services using nothing but a magnet and a rusty nail, as long as they got deployed? *We* would care, because it'd slow us down. Of course I think we need proper CI/CD, just as I think we need to write good code. It just seems that scrum (or at least the way we're doing scrum) doesn't help us do these things. Cheers, -- Thomi Richards [email protected]
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
