I disagree that dependency handling is to blame, but that's just my 2ยข. No idea about the other packages, but agree that handling things uniformly makes sense.
By the way you may have misjudged the flashplugin-nonfree package: from what I remember, it doesn't install flash directly, but has to be run from the command-line to do so, and it probably asks the licence then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical Partner Developers, which is subscribed to adobe-flashplugin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132690 Title: adobe-flashplugin installs without license agreement To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1132690/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-partner-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-partner-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
