On Jan 12, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Rick Olson wrote: > On 1/12/07, Faisal N Jawdat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, philippe lachaise wrote: >>> +1. Most RDoc-generated sites are good at convincing visitors that >>> their efforts at understanding are doomed to failure. >> >> +1. my initial experiences with rails were pretty painful, as i got >> a giant list of the api and no small nugget of big picture. and >> capistrano isn't really a niggling-api detail kind of tool. >> >> -faisal > > For what it's worth, I'm going to try converting manuals.ror.org to a > Mephisto site. I've seen what Justin's doing with the new Prototype > site, and it's amazing. I can easily throw another mephisto instance > for a capistrano-only docs if anyone's interested. It handles > multiple authors and versioning.
I'd be willing to give that a try, though a mephisto account per author feels a bit top-heavy for the "community-driven" documentation effort I had in mind. Maybe that's what we try first, though. What would it take to set that up? - Jamis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
