On Feb 24, 2007, at 3:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Lately, I've talked to some people who deploy Rails apps in more > formal IT environments. There is some demand to deploy from a > zipped release package, instead of a Subversion trunk (or even a > tag). It comes from the notion that development and deployment > should be separated activities, for a bunch of security-related > reasons. Particularly that deployers should have no write access to > source code, while developers should have no write access to > production environment.
Would it be insufficient to only give deployment read-only access to the repository, and not give development access to the deployment servers? -faisal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
