cap _2.0.0_ change_password worked. So I figured that if that worked
(and assuming you have tested :pty => true), then I must have been
doing something stupid.
Re-read my script and saw that I put the :pty => true on the task, not
the run. :(

Moved it to the run and all is well. So yes, it appears that they must
fail without pty attached.

Thank you again for your prompt and on target help.

-ken

On Sep 24, 3:55 pm, "Jamis Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm! Well, adding :pty => true should have reverted capistrano back to
> the 2.0 behavior. If you try withcap2.0, does it work?
>
>  cap_2.0.0_ change_password
>
> - Jamis
>
> On 9/24/07, ken brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for responding.
>
> > I tried :pty => true. Same exact result.
>
> > Here is my output. (Names changed to protect the innocent servers).
> > C:\somedir>capchange_password
> >   * executing `change_password'
> >   * executing "passwd"
> >     servers: ["foo.bar.net"]
> > Password:
> >     [foo.bar.net] executing command
> >  ** Unexpected failure. Password file/table unchanged.
> >     command finished
> > command "passwd" failed on foo.bar.net
>
> > I'm not sure what to do next to debug this.
>
> > thanks,
> > ken
>
> > On Sep 15, 10:42 am, "Jamis Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I suspectpasswdon those platforms will fail unless there is a pty
> > > attached. Try doing this:
>
> > >   run "passwd", :pty => true
>
> > > - Jamis
>
> > > On 9/10/07, ken brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I have tons of user ids on different machines that I like to keep in
> > > > sync.
>
> > > > I was usingcap2.0to executepasswdon a remote host (solaris as
> > > > well as aix).
> > > > I would read the data coming back in and send back the appropriate
> > > > response.
> > > > Everything worked pretty well.
>
> > > > Since pulling down2.1(Capistrano v2.0.100) I get the following
> > > > immediately afterpasswdis sent.
> > > > Unexpected failure. Password file/table unchanged.
>
> > > > I'm pretty sure you changed a few nuts a bolts about the SSH
> > > > implementation and the way its creating sessions.
> > > > Any thoughts on this?
>
> > > > -Ken


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to