Jeff, the two-factor auth is a different issue, regarding a form of authentication that Capistrano does not entirely support yet. Your problem has (as I read it) to do with a different box with different connection needs--a gateway, different user, and different login requirements (public key).

Capistrano does not (yet) support a gateway per server. If you need something like that, you can work around cap's limitation by setting up the tunnel yourself (using ssh), and then specifying [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port as the host for that specific server.

- Jamis

On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:39 AM, jemminger wrote:


Apologies if this is a double-post; I don't see my first attempt
posted yet...


Anyway, my question is this: am I having the same problem here?
http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano/browse_thread/thread/8ac721f9a169eb41

I can provide a debug dump if so.
Thanks,
Jeff



On Jan 2, 4:47 pm, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, currently Net::SSH only does either/or, but not both. If you
could send me the debug output, I'll take a look. No guarantees I'll
have time to implement it, but then again, I'm currently working on
Net::SSH v2, so it'd be a more likely time for me to hack on it. :)

Please send the dump to me, directly: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!

- Jamis

On Jan 2, 2008, at 2:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Nothing to be ashamed of ... I wouldn't know what it is either except
our security droids require it on all publicly accessible systems.
Anyway, in this context it means that two forms of authentication are required, specifically a public key *and* a password. My guess is that Net::SSH only knows how to provide one or the other but not both. The
operative word there is "guess"; I would be happy to provide the
output that results when I set ssh_options[:verbose] to :debug - I
didn't do it in my original post because I'll have to make sure it's
all "sanitized".

Thanks for the quick response ... WkH

On Jan 2, 2:44 pm, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not ashamed to reveal my ignorance and state that I have never
heard of two-factor auth...so it isn't surprising that Net::SSH would not handle that, since I wrote that, too. I based Net::SSH off of the
base ssh RFC's, which I don't recall mentioning two-factor
authentication.

- Jamis

On Jan 2, 2008, at 11:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

One of my resolutions for the new year is to replace my crufty old
expect scripts with Capistrano. Unfortunately, I'm having trouble
with
the :gateway mechanism. Our bastion servers are configured for two-
factor auth: public key and password. Capistrano, or Net::SSH,
doesn't
seem to be able to handle that flavor of authentication. When I run
the following task, which just tests the ability to login to the
bastion server:

task :whos_on, :hosts => "my.bastion.server" do
run "who"
end

I get the following output:

$ cap whos_on
* executing `whos_on'
* executing "who"
  servers: ["my.bastion.server"]
Password:
connection failed for: my.bastion.server
(Net::SSH::AuthenticationFailed: username)

I'm able to ssh to my.bastion.server with no problems. I'm also able
to set up a tunnel through it to any of our production boxes using
just straight ssh. Doing set :gateway, "my.bastion.server" in my
capfile gives me no joy either.

I have verified that the whos_on task works when run within the
production network where the boxes don't do two-factor auth. That's why I'm focused on the two-factor thing. To be useful I really need
the :gateway mechanism to work.

Anyone have any ideas?

... WkH

smime.p7s
3KDownload




smime.p7s
3KDownload

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to