Thanks!

On Apr 10, 12:36 pm, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The escaping is there so that commands like this:
>
>    run(<<-CMD)
>      if [ some_condition ];
>      then
>        do_something
>        do_another_thing
>      fi
>    CMD
>
> Get translated into a single line and passed through to the remote
> host correctly. I'm pretty sure there are tests for that case, so if
> you change it and the tests all still pass, then you're probably ok. :)
>
> - Jamis
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Brian Hartin wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'd like to keep my task definitions within deploy.rb, if possible.  I
> > can open the Command class in deploy.rb, if need be.
>
> > In what situation would we want the '\\\', anyway?  "a\\\b" gets
> > changed to:
>
> > a\
> > b
>
> > Would I break anything by changing "\\\n" to "\\n" in Command#process!
>
> > Thanks for your help,
>
> > Brian
>
> > On Apr 10, 11:34 am, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I suspect that's breaking because your line break is inside a quoted
> >> string...and capistrano's escaping is too naive to understand that.
> >> You could put the command in a script and execute the script, thereby
> >> foiling cap's escaping logic.
>
> >> - Jamis
>
> >> On Apr 10, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Brian Hartin wrote:
>
> >>> In line 24, we have
>
> >>> @command = command.strip.gsub(/\r?\n/, "\\\n")
>
> >>> If I have a remote command that includes line breaks, e.g. "echo -
> >>> e 'a
> >>> \nb' | foo' it will translate it to:
>
> >>> echo -e 'a\\\nb' | foo
>
> >>> Which fails.  If I change that line in Process to use "\\n", or to
> >>> use
> >>> '\\\n' (single quotes), it works.  It also works if I use non-
> >>> interpolated strings in my command, but that is ugly.  Am I missing
> >>> something or should "\\\n" be "\\n"?
>
> >>> Thanks,
>
> >>> Brian Hartin
>
> >> smime.p7s
> >> 3KDownload
>
> > >
>
>
>  smime.p7s
> 3KDownload

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to