I have a branch with the patches at:
http://github.com/gabriel/capistrano/commits/desc_enhancement_clean

First commit adds :set option to fetch:
http://github.com/gabriel/capistrano/commit/6ac6bdb0e030af1286c010669cfa0276f2f38209

Second commit adds block enhancement to desc keyword:
http://github.com/gabriel/capistrano/commit/d2ca02980d11d7247cdf27665cec2dffab1e9bd6

An example of the use of the desc enhancement:

--

namespace :merb do

  desc <<-DESC do |d|
    Run the migrate rake task. By default, it runs this in most
recently
    deployed version of the app. However, you can specify a different
release
    via the migrate_target variable, which must be one of :latest (for
the
    default behavior), or :current (for the release indicated by the
    `current' symlink). Strings will work for those values instead of
symbols,
    too. You can also specify additional environment variables to pass
to rake
    via the migrate_env variable. Finally, you can specify the full
path to the
    rake executable by setting the rake variable.
    DESC
    d.reference(:rake, "Path to rake", :default => "rake")
    d.reference(:merb_env, "Merb environment", :default =>
"production")
    d.reference(:migrate_target, "Migration target", :default
=> :latest)
    d.reference(:migrate_env, "Migration env", :default => "")
  end
  task :migrate, :roles => :db, :only => { :primary => true } do

    current_directory = case migrate_target.to_sym
      when :current then current_path
      when :latest  then current_release
      else raise ArgumentError, "unknown migration target
#{migrate_target.inspect}"
      end

    run "cd #{current_directory}; #{rake} MERB_ENV=#{merb_env}
#{migrate_env} db:migrate"
  end

end

--

There is a potential incompatibility with the TaskDefinition desc
attribute, which now returns a Capsistrano::Description object instead
of a String. I'm not sure how public this desc attribute is mean to
be. The description method still returns a String :) ... It is
possible to keep the desc as a string and create another attribute for
the description object. Let me know if you'd rather take that route.

Another (maybe) non-obvious thing is that the desc block is not called
until right before the task execution.

Everything else should be obvious. :)

On May 15, 12:12 pm, gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah the :set is way better.. :)
>
> On 15 May, 10:21, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you have the time, I certainly think you're the right one to  
> > implement this, Gabe. You've got the real-world need, which is the  
> > mother of invention. :)
>
> > Regarding fetch_or_default, what if it was just an option to fetch()  
> > that determined whether or not the variable was set to the default or  
> > not? Something like:
>
> >    foo = fetch(:bar, "hello") # returns bar or "hello", but does not  
> > change bar
> >    foo = fetch(:bar, "hello", :set => true) # sets bar to "hello" if  
> > bar is not set
>
> > It does break the Hash-like API, but then, so would fetch_or_default,  
> > so I think it's fair. In general, I prefer to minimize the number of  
> > API calls that people would need to know, in favor of generalizing a  
> > single interface. It's the same philosophy behind ActiveRecord's  
> > "find" method, which used to be "find_all", "find_first", and so  
> > forth, and was later combined into the single "find".
>
> > Thanks for the offer to work on this, Gabe! I think, for me, the  
> > biggest win is the automated documentation generation, which really  
> > doesn't even depend on the variable dependencies being documented. :)  
> > At any rate, bring it on!
>
> > - Jamis
>
> > On May 14, 2008, at 11:07 PM, gabe wrote:
>
> > > Also, I meant to offer to help make any of the changes, just let me
> > > know.. since forking is the new friending these days.
>
> > > On May 15, 12:58 am, gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Yeah I like that alot. Yeah arg or argument is definitely not the
> > >> right word.. Maybe "variable" or "ref" or "var" are options too.
>
> > >> I think this even works (although just because you can doesn't mean
> > >> you should):
>
> > >> desc(<<-DESC) do |d|
> > >>   Here is my description...
>
> > >>   DESC
> > >>   d.references :rake, "Path to rake", :default => "rake"
> > >> end
>
> > >> I also had the case where I wanted the default to be the value of
> > >> another variable (so you could override it, or fall back to another
> > >> variable).
>
> > >>   d.references :sphinx_db_name, "Name of sphinx db", :set => :db_name
>
> > >> which I guess was shorthand for :default => Proc.new
> > >> { fetch(:db_name) }. Although as long as we are in the desc block we
> > >> wouldn't need the Proc wrapper and so... I guess just a use (or edge)
> > >> case to be aware of.
>
> > >> Another thing I monkey patched, was to support a fetch_or_default
> > >> method which set the variable to the default if it wasn't set (as
> > >> opposed to returning a default value for that call only)... If that
> > >> makes sense.
>
> > >> --gabe
>
> > >> On May 14, 5:10 pm, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >>> That's a neat idea (and I LOVE the autogenerated documentation!),  
> > >>> but
> > >>> I'm not sure I like adding (1) another "keyword", and (2) calling  
> > >>> them
> > >>> arguments, when they're really just variables that the task  
> > >>> depends on.
>
> > >>> What if this was implemented by extending the 'desc' keyword,
> > >>> something like this:
>
> > >>>    desc do |d|
> > >>>      d.text "foo"
> > >>>      d.references :rake, "Path to rake", :default => "rake"
> > >>>      # ...
> > >>>    end
>
> > >>> The original syntax would continue to work, too:
>
> > >>>    desc "foo"
>
> > >>> This way, we could later decide that we want to document other  
> > >>> aspects
> > >>> of the task (roles, subtasks it calls, etc.) without resorting to
> > >>> further cluttering the namespace. What do you think?
>
> > >>> - Jamis
>
> > >>> On May 14, 2008, at 2:29 PM, gabe wrote:
>
> > >>>> In the capitate gem, we added a task_arg metho to the task DSL, so
> > >>>> that we could document and setup defaults for cap variables.
>
> > >>>> For example,
>
> > >>>> ---
>
> > >>>>  desc <<-DESC
> > >>>>    Run the migrate rake task ....
> > >>>>  DESC
> > >>>>  task_arg(:rake, "Path to rake", :default => "rake")
> > >>>>  task_arg(:merb_env, "Merb environment", :default => "")
> > >>>>  task_arg(:migrate_target, "Migration target", :default => :latest)
> > >>>>  task :migrate, :roles => :db, :only => { :primary => true } do
>
> > >>>>    current_directory = case migrate_target.to_sym
> > >>>>      when :current then current_path
> > >>>>      when :latest  then current_release
> > >>>>      else raise ArgumentError, "unknown migration target
> > >>>> #{migrate_target.inspect}"
> > >>>>      end
>
> > >>>>    run "cd #{current_directory}; #{rake} MERB_ENV=#{merb_env}
> > >>>> #{migrate_env} db:migrate"
> > >>>>  end
>
> > >>>> ---
>
> > >>>>http://github.com/gabriel/capitate/tree/master/lib/recipes/merb.rb
>
> > >>>> Using this info, we also generate documentation, for example:
> > >>>>http://capitate.rubyforge.org/recipes/merb.html
>
> > >>>> Is this a weird "extension" of cap or do you think its something  
> > >>>> that
> > >>>> might be useful to add in?
>
> > >>>> Thanks!
>
> > >>>  smime.p7s
> > >>> 3KDownload
>
> >  smime.p7s
> > 3KDownload
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to