ah, so it's strictly for migrations. Now I understand. OK, I can just choose an app machine.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Jamis Buck wrote: > > > Yes, it's correct. If you don't want rails on your DB server, then you > can put one of your app servers in the db role. The db role only > exists as the location from where migrations are run. It is entirely > legal to do this: > > role :app, "foo" > role :db, "foo", :primary => true > > - Jamis > > On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Jamie Orchard-Hays wrote: > >> >> Now that I'm using multiple servers, I am surprised to find >> capistrano >> deploying my whole rails up to my db server. Is this correct >> behavior? >> I'm using Cap 2.3.101 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jamie >> >>> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
