I'd rather keep them in a single repository just because of the
headache of managing lots of repositories - the repository they are in
is already one of a number of repositories..
It seems like it'd be nice if the notion of a package/module was
distinct from the notion of a repository.
Josh

On Jun 29, 2:08 am, Lee Hambley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would expect this would work quite nicely if they were in two repositories
> (if you are thinking of them as two separate pieces of code). Then app A)
> could treat app B) as submodule
> 2009/6/29 Rafael G. <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> > I don't know git (I use it for basics things) but could you put your
> > octave code as external in your rails app?
>
> > Joshua wrote:
> > > It resides as two subdirectories of a single git repository.
> > > E.g.,
> > > root/.git
> > > root/my-nifty-rails-app
> > > root/a-pile-of-octave-code-and-libraries
> > > root/a-bunch-of-other-stuff
>
> > > I'm interested in deploying 'my-nifty-rails-app' and 'a-pile-of-octave-
> > > code-and-libraries'.  Also the rails app depends on the octave code so
> > > both dirs need to be deployed consistently.
> > > I was thinking of having a subdir in the rails app that is a symbolic
> > > link to the octave directory and somehow (?) write some capistrano
> > > code to deploy the octave code as a monolithic blob.
> > > I also know that at the moment capistrano does not support deploying
> > > out of a subdirectory of a git repository - there's a patch floating
> > > around somewhere to help with that.
> > > Any suggestions on a reasonable way to deploy the dependant octave
> > > code?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Josh
>
> > > On Jun 27, 11:24 pm, Lee Hambley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> Does is reside in one repository or two?
> > >> - Lee
>
> > >> 2009/6/28 Joshua <[email protected]>
>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>> I'm new to Capistrano.  Is there an easy way to deploy an application
> > >>> that requires two directories?  The first directory is a vanilla Ruby
> > >>> on Rails application directory tree.  The second is a directory tree
> > >>> consisting of a pile of Octave code.  My rails app uses a gem that
> > >>> lets ruby talk to Octave.  I'd prefer to keep the Octave code out of
> > >>> the RoR app tree because it is also used outside my web app.  I
> > >>> haven't come across a clean way to deploy using Capistrano, but it's
> > >>> quite possible I'm missing something simple. Any ideas?
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Josh
>
> > --
> > Rafa
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to