again, some of you say that you dont use the reaper script. I don´t, too. But you have to explizitly overwrite the task to stop passanger to use it. It´s not "if you dont use reaper style scripts" -> you have no problem, it´s the oposite. And its a really hard thing for a new capistrano user what I am, to find this "bug" and to overwrite the old calls for the deprecated reaper scripts.
So "I don´t use the reaper script anyway" is not a relativition of the problem. Sorry if I sound angry did not have breakfast yet ;) but thanx for the answers. On 22 Aug, 14:30, "Rafael G." <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > I agree. > > > > Mathias Meyer wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Simone Carletti<[email protected]> wrote: > > > I talked about that with Lee, we agreed on making Passenger style > > deployment the new default, so we'd basically end up with something > > very lightweight and more uptodate with current deployment practices. > > There's a ticket already, so feel free to add your thoughts: > >https://capistrano.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8716/tickets/99 > > > I don't think there's a need to make it smart, I'd just consider > > Passenger the current way of deploying Rails, no matter if you're > > using Rails 2.3 or an earlier version. > > > Cheers, Mathias > > -- > Rafa --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Capistrano" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
