The only problem with that is although these 20 tasks aren't dependent on each other the next cap jobs need to wait for them to finish before they can run. I guess I can write in logic in cap to check the status of the jobs that where put into the background, make sure they are finished then run the next cap job.
Brian On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Lee Hambley <[email protected]> wrote: > So leverage the power of your shell, you can run() something and pass the > appropriate nohup/background command to ask your shell to run it in the > background, which will leave cap free to move on to the next run() command, > etc. > > - Lee > > -- > * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Capistrano" group. > * To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] For more options, visit this > group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en > -- * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Capistrano" group. * To post to this group, send email to [email protected] * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
