I do have this option set to true. I was using password authentication 
before.

I found out that one can setup 

ssh_options[:forward_agent] = true


to enable agent forwarding. I tried but with no luck. My ssh agent 
configuration works, as explained in my previous post. 

Any suggestions on how to investigate this problem? 

On Monday, January 28, 2013 11:44:20 PM UTC+8, Rafa García wrote:
>
> Hi Jake,
>
> Maybe you can play with pty value. Example:
>
> default_run_options[:pty] = true
>
> Explanation from Capistrano's code:
>
>         # * :pty - if true, a pseudo-tty will be allocated for each 
> command. The
>         #   default is false. Note that there are benefits and drawbacks 
> both ways.
>         #   Empirically, it appears that if a pty is allocated, the SSH 
> server daemon
>         #   will _not_ read user shell start-up scripts (e.g. bashrc, 
> etc.). However,
>         #   if a pty is _not_ allocated, some commands will refuse to run 
> in
>         #   interactive mode and will not prompt for (e.g.) passwords.
>
> This topic(pseudo terminals <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo_terminal>) 
> always confuse me.
>
> Regards
>
> [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo_terminal
>
>
>
> 2013/1/28 Jake Chen <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>
>> The login server of my company is rather paranoid I guess. I can' t use 
>> that server as gateway for tunneling to production servers. 
>>
>> # Term 1
>> ssh -N 7845:prod.server:22 -L jake@login1
>>
>> # Term 2
>> ssh [email protected]:7845
>>
>>
>> will fail. Term1 returns something like 
>>
>> Channel 2: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
>>
>>
>> I googled a lot, found out this is the reason that failed capistrano. 
>> Then I learned ssh-agent stuff, managed getting this to work:
>>
>> ssh jake@login1 ssh [email protected]
>>
>>
>> This command will give me a fake terminal. Saying something like:
>>
>> Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
>>
>>
>> executing `hostname` will return the correct answer.
>>
>> Is there anyway that I can let capistrano deploy my humble code this way?
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Capistrano" group.
>> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected] <javascript:> For more options, visit 
>> this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Capistrano" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
* You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
* To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
* To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to