Inspecting the contents and comparing the pids specified in the files vs the 
ones that are running may give you clues to the problem. 

Make a note of your pids pre-deploy; do the deploy then compare the pids 
previous; to the current pids; and to the pids in the directory. 

On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:45 AM, bsod99 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Further update on this, in case it helps pinpoint the issue(s) - when an 
> error (as described above) arises after a deployment, if I remove the 
> releases/cached-copy/log/pids folders and run deploy:setup and deploy, my 
> sites work correctly. 
> 
> On Wednesday, 6 February 2013 21:49:09 UTC, bsod99 wrote:
>> 
>> I'm on CentOS 6, standard LAMP setup. It's really puzzling.
>> 
>> I wonder if I should just start afresh, as I've been messing about with the 
>> deployment script a fair bit. 
>> 
>> On Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:46:37 UTC, dbray wrote:
>>> 
>>> What web server are you using. I experienced something similar with 
>>> unicorn. Because of its forking the master process it had already resolved 
>>> the symlink to a specific directory. Everything would work fine until the 
>>> original dir the master was originally started from finally got cleaned up. 
>>> 
>>> I used to use passenger and it had similar issues until they incorporated a 
>>> patch to re-evaluate the symlink for each fork. 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:30 AM, bsod99 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks, switched to latest_release. All the targets exist in shared, and 
>>>> 'cap deploy:shared_symlinks' is executing successfully during the 
>>>> deployment. Checking the symlinks after shows they are correct. 
>>>> 
>>>> The cap task isn't raising any errors. The issue is that non-shared core 
>>>> classes in my application are sporadically not found after a deployment, 
>>>> even though these files are sitting in the current release in the correct 
>>>> place. Also, upon re-deploying, sometimes the error can be another core 
>>>> class which isn't found. This just adds to the confusion in that the error 
>>>> isn't consistent. 
>>>> 
>>>> For testing, I've set keep_releases to 1 for now - on a couple of sites, 
>>>> deployments are working fine, but on another, I'm having the issue 
>>>> described above. The deployment scripts are practically identical.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday, 29 January 2013 17:26:33 UTC, dbray wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> It should be #{latest_release} not #{release_path}
>>>>> 
>>>>> release_path only works during a deploy; latest_release will work all the 
>>>>> time. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> See: 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/blob/master/lib/capistrano/recipes/deploy.rb
>>>>> 
>>>>> Have you ensured that all the targets in shared exist before attempting 
>>>>> to create the symlinks?
>>>>> 
>>>>> What isn't working about it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you invoking 'cap deploy:shared_symlinks' then see my suggestion 
>>>>> above. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the cap task raising an error; post a copy of a failed run. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the task executing but you just don't end up with the symlinks?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are there files pre-existing in the release directory from checkout; you 
>>>>> need to remove them in order to recreate them as symlinks. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 3:30 AM, bsod99 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alas, this still isn't correct - symlinking definitely a bit messed up, 
>>>>>> Can anyone see what is wrong with this staging.rb script? 
>>>>>> http://pastie.org/5927281
>>>>>> I must still have the order wrong...thanks for any help
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thursday, 24 January 2013 09:47:59 UTC, bsod99  wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for all the replies. I followed dbray's advice and kept releases 
>>>>>>> at, and adjusted sequencing to:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> after "deploy:update", "deploy:symlink_shared"
>>>>>>> after "deploy:restart", "deploy:cleanup"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This seems to be working fine (and makes sense, having thought through 
>>>>>>> more carefully about what each is doing)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thursday, 24 January 2013 02:42:51 UTC, dbray  wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Keep releases should be 2 at minimum in my opinion
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:26 AM, bsod99 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I followed the advice in another post about how to clean up old 
>>>>>>>>> capistrano releases, however, i've realised that the way I've 
>>>>>>>>> implemented this has messed up the paths in my application (just on a 
>>>>>>>>> staging site thankfully!). I am using the code below in my 
>>>>>>>>> config/deploy/staging.rb script, but it can't be running at the 
>>>>>>>>> correct point, as after deployment I end up with application failing 
>>>>>>>>> as it's trying to load classes from earlier releases. If I remove the 
>>>>>>>>> keep_releases line and the one below, and redeploy, everything works 
>>>>>>>>> again. Has anyone come across this issue?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> set :use_sudo, false
>>>>>>>>> set :keep_releases, 1
>>>>>>>>> after "deploy:update", "deploy:cleanup"
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> namespace :deploy do
>>>>>>>>>   task :symlink_shared do
>>>>>>>>>     // run some commands i need
>>>>>>>>>   end
>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> before "deploy:restart", "deploy:symlink_shared"
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Capistrano" group.
>>>>>>>>> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Capistrano" group.
>>>>>> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> [email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Capistrano" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Capistrano" group.
>>>> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Capistrano" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>  
>>>>  
> -- 
> -- 
> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Capistrano" group.
> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Capistrano" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
* You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
* To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
* To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to