Kenton,

On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 7:27:30 PM UTC+1, Kenton Varda wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Do you have any custom type handlers registered via addTypeHandler()? Is 
> it possible that the handler class has gone out-of-scope (been destroyed) 
> by the time the encoder is executed?
>

No, I am not using custom handlers. I am just dumping the Builder like this 
(simplified):

template<typename T>
void dump_msg(T& msg){
try{
capnp::JsonCodec enc;
enc.setPrettyPrint(PPRINT);
auto t = enc.encode(msg);
fprintf(stderr, "MSG: %s\n", t.cStr());
}catch(...){}
}

Where, in this case, msg is:

147         capnp::MallocMessageBuilder builder;                            
        
148         auto msg = builder.initRoot<Message>();    

//Fill it

254                          dump_msg(msg);

So the builder and encoder al valid, I believe in the entire dumping. 
Moreover, valgrind would complain before the SEGFAULT if something would be 
out of the stack, and the only thing I get is the direct SEGFAULT.

Any thoughts? I will keep trying to isolate the problem

marc

-Kenton
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Marc Sune <ma...@voltanet.io 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> > That's about all that I can get, even though capnproto is compiled with 
>> DEBUG.
>>
>> Or shall I say, it should :/
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 7:17:02 PM UTC+1, Marc Sune wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I am experiencing a _very_ strange segfault during JSON encoding of 
>>> message:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> [Switching to Thread 27946]
>>> 0x0000000001e4b81a in std::__detail::_Hashtable_ebo_helper<1, 
>>> capnp::(anonymous namespace)::TypeHash, 
>>> true>::_S_cget(std::__detail::_Hashtable_ebo_helper<1, capnp::(anonymous 
>>> namespace)::TypeHash, true> const&) ()
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0  0x0000000001e4b81a in std::__detail::_Hashtable_ebo_helper<1, 
>>> capnp::(anonymous namespace)::TypeHash, 
>>> true>::_S_cget(std::__detail::_Hashtable_ebo_helper<1, capnp::(anonymous 
>>> namespace)::TypeHash, true> const&) ()
>>> #1  0x0000000001e4b11a in std::__detail::_Hash_code_base<capnp::Type, 
>>> std::pair<capnp::Type const, capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*>, 
>>> std::__detail::_Select1st, capnp::(anonymous namespace)::TypeHash, 
>>> std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, 
>>> true>::_M_h1() const ()
>>> #2  0x0000000001e4a976 in std::__detail::_Hash_code_base<capnp::Type, 
>>> std::pair<capnp::Type const, capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*>, 
>>> std::__detail::_Select1st, capnp::(anonymous namespace)::TypeHash, 
>>> std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, 
>>> true>::_M_hash_code(capnp::Type const&) const ()
>>> #3  0x0000000001e4a401 in std::_Hashtable<capnp::Type, 
>>> std::pair<capnp::Type const, capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*>, 
>>> std::allocator<std::pair<capnp::Type const, capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*> 
>>> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<capnp::Type>, capnp::(anonymous 
>>> namespace)::TypeHash, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, 
>>> std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, 
>>> std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::find(capnp::Type 
>>> const&) const ()
>>> #4  0x0000000001e483a3 in std::unordered_map<capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*, capnp::(anonymous namespace)::TypeHash, 
>>> std::equal_to<capnp::Type>, std::allocator<std::pair<capnp::Type const, 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::HandlerBase*> > >::find(capnp::Type const&) const ()
>>> #5  0x0000000001e443d5 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #6  0x0000000001e44a6f in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #7  0x0000000001e45a36 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encodeField(capnp::StructSchema::Field, 
>>> capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #8  0x0000000001e45377 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #9  0x0000000001e45a36 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encodeField(capnp::StructSchema::Field, 
>>> capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #10 0x0000000001e45377 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #11 0x0000000001e45a36 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encodeField(capnp::StructSchema::Field, 
>>> capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #12 0x0000000001e45377 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #13 0x0000000001e45a36 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encodeField(capnp::StructSchema::Field, 
>>> capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #14 0x0000000001e45618 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #15 0x0000000001e45a36 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encodeField(capnp::StructSchema::Field, 
>>> capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #16 0x0000000001e45618 in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type, 
>>> capnp::JsonValue::Builder) const ()
>>> #17 0x0000000001e43fcc in 
>>> capnp::JsonCodec::encode(capnp::DynamicValue::Reader, capnp::Type) const ()
>>> #18 0x00000000009e02c7 in capnp::JsonCodec::encode<Message::Builder 
>>> const&> (this=0x7ffff22e1210, value=...) at 
>>> /home/marc/.../capnp/compat/json.h:216
>>> ```
>>>
>>> That's about all that I can get, even though capnproto is compiled with 
>>> DEBUG.
>>>
>>> The message trying to be encoded (sorry, I am not sure I can share the 
>>> entire set of schemas), is a series of simple objects, which in the 
>>> inner-most object contains a list that is initialized normally:
>>>
>>> 115         s.initIfaceType(1);     
>>>
>>> The funny part; not initializing it, doesn't make JsonCodec crash. But 
>>> initializing it, or initializing it + setting a value (valid one), produces 
>>> the crash always. 
>>>
>>> Valgrind etc... doesn't complain until that point.
>>>
>>> I am trying to isolate the problem, to make it reproducible, but I am 
>>> not able yet.
>>>
>>> Any ideas on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Cap'n Proto" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to capnproto+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cap'n Proto" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to capnproto+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.

Reply via email to