Ah, yep that was it. I had net.core.rmem_default and net.core.wmem_default
set to a rather high value for another application. Reverting them to
normal fixed the test. Thanks!

John Wang
Lead Robotics Engineer
May Mobility


On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:32 PM Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmm, well I'm not sure what to say here. Maybe your unix sockets have
> larger buffers for some reason? Are you running a weird kernel version?
> What architecture is this?
>
> In any case, this error doesn't indicate a problem with Cap'n Proto, only
> a problem with the test, so you should be safe ignoring it.
>
> -Kenton
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 5:37 PM John Wang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> My system also returns 1024.
>>
>> John Wang
>> Lead Robotics Engineer
>> May Mobility
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 5:43 PM Kenton Varda <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like this error occurs when the number of file descriptors sent
>>> on a unix socket exceeds `ulimit -n`.
>>>
>>> Admittedly, the test tries to send lots of file descriptors over a unix
>>> socket, stopping only when the socket buffer seems to be full. So depending
>>> on the system configuration, it could indeed cause this error.
>>>
>>> On my system, `ulimit -n` returns 1024, while the test manages to send
>>> 278 file descriptors before filling the buffer.
>>>
>>> What does `ulimit -n` show on your system?
>>>
>>> -Kenton
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:14 PM John Wang <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah sorry, missed that bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> kj/async-io-unix.c++:530: failed: ::sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0): Too many
>>>>> references: cannot splice
>>>>> stack: 7fa89b08ceb2 7fa89b07af3b 5bdb1d 7fa89ae084dd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Wang
>>>> Lead Robotics Engineer
>>>> May Mobility
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 5:12 PM Kenton Varda <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> Was there anything in the log before the fail line? Usually there
>>>>> should be some sort of error message describing what went wrong, and maybe
>>>>> a stack trace.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kenton
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:53 PM John Wang <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm seeing a failure on the following test. Did a quick search of the
>>>>>> group and didn't see any mention of it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ FAIL ] kj/async-io-test.c++:281: legacy test:
>>>>>> AsyncIo/CapabilityPipeBlockedSendStream (52576 μs)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This result is consistent across 3 runs of `make -j4 check`. My
>>>>>> environment is Ubuntu 16.04 and gcc 5.4.0, and I'm building 
>>>>>> `release-0.8.0`
>>>>>> from git. Let me know if I can provide any other info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Cap'n Proto" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capnproto/3820e497-c121-413c-9651-d3af19e068c3n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capnproto/3820e497-c121-413c-9651-d3af19e068c3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cap'n Proto" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capnproto/CACXQX06Q_0cQWz-i_%3Db9f_birL-jKoVO%2BpRdYR_GvY%3DdbtU%3D3w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to