Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-capport-00-03: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-capport/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Warren responded nicely to my comment on the 00-01 version about "As endpoints become inherently more secure, existing interception techniques will become less effective or will fail entirely." and I understand that a previous version that attempted to say "inherently more secure because X mechanisms are being deployed" was problematic, but the current text still sounds like we're thinking happy thoughts, and I know you aren't. Would it be any less problematic to say "inherently more secure in response to X security threats"? Where X might be "pervasive surveillance", "DNS spoofing", etc? "No" might be a perfectly reasonable answer ... _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
