How does this sound? Alissa: editorial, just fix it Spencer: maybe pass Jari: important, just fix it Benoit: maybe related, but we can let the WG decide Joel: is right, but I don't know what to do about that. I'd rather have the goal and miss it due to ... physics ... than to not have it at all. I think that the notion that *secure* detection is possible is a Hard problem.
On 20 November 2015 at 09:09, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: > capport denizens, > > After yesterday's IESG telechat, the capport charter was approved > *pending edits*, and I'm holding it as I wait for responses to the > assorted comments in this final round of review. > > See the comments here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-capport/ballot/ > > Please review the comments ASAP, decide what edits, if any, are needed > to address the comments, and post a collective response to the IESG > list (one message responding to all the comments is fine). I'll check > that, make the edits in the datatracker, and we can finalize the > approval of the charter. > > Thanks, > Barry _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
