Sorry, link was to wrong version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-01
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 AM, David Bird <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for an ICMP solution ... > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-00 > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Paul Ebersman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> ddolson> Regarding non-browser clients, even non-HTTP clients, and >> ddolson> considering this is the IETF, it seems reasonable to find an >> ddolson> IP-layer solution vs. an HTTP-layer solution. >> >> Indeed... All sorts of phone apps don't use HTTP but need to tickle the >> reaction. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Captive-portals mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals >> > >
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
