I've created a repository for the architecture draft at https://github.com/capport-wg/api
I'll send a separate email with the process I think we should use for GitHub. Margaret, Mark, can you send me GitHub usernames so that I can add you to the editors team? If you are comfortable setting up the repository, please do so. If you like, you can send me the source and I can set things up. On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote: > (long overdue update) > > There having been no dissent, objections, or concerns raised consensus > is that the group would like to adopt this document. > > Please re-upload draft-donnelly-capport-detection-02 with -ietf- in > the name. I might suggest changing the suffix to something like > "-capport-api" (since this document is no longer about detection). > (draft-ietf-capport-api-00) > > Thanks! > > On 30 August 2017 at 20:03, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote: >> All, >> >> As indicated in the minutes from Prague >> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a >> general hum in favor of the API document: >> >> """ >> 4. API document: do we need a milestone? Humming: in favor. >> 5. Is this document a good basis. Humming in favor. >> """" >> >> This email is to initiate a two week call for adoption for: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-donnelly-capport-detection/ >> >> Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague. >> >> Thanks, >> -Erik _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
