Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've had a number of discussions in the captive portals group about > fixing RFC 7710.
> Erik and I would like to propose a plan for that work. We would keep > this to addressing the issues that we have identified thus far. > Namely: Hi, so are you considering 7710bis, or a document that just Updates 7710? 7710bis seems excessive to me, unless you think that we have to change the DHCP/RA option codes in the process. > 1. The purpose of the URI is not well defined. We would reference the > capport architecture and API documents for that. The group would need > to decide between: a. point to the API b. point to a login page Could the API document do the required updates? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captiveemail@example.com https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals