Thanks for doing this Kyle. I see one issue that might be closed. And a couple that appear to be blocked on discussion. But this looks close.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018, at 04:34, Kyle Larose wrote: > This update is mostly a refresh until I can spend a bit more time on > it. Either way, it addresses some of the issues we raised in Montreal. > > Changes > ------------ > > Major Changes: > - Reduce the scope of the signaling protocol: > - Changed many SHOULDs to MAYs > - Clarified that the signal is a simple indication that traffic is > restricted. > - Document that the signaling protocol does not provide mechanisms for > non-binary blocking. > > Minor Changes: > - Some small changes to the diagrams > - Mention that the identity depends on the network attachment point > - Fixed spelling/grammar mistakes > - Fixed up some ambiguous phrasing > - Changed an example workflow to when conditions are about to expire, > rather than when they have already expired. _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
