On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <sam...@wso2.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <hira...@wso2.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <lah...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> What is the active branch we need to commit if we are doing changes for
>>> the next recent release ? I can see two branches [1] and [2]. People might
>>> commit to the old one[2] and if we are going to proceed with 3.0.1 they
>>> might have to merge them again to 3.0.1.
>>>
>>
>> 3.0.0 should be off limits for everyone now. I think all the products
>> based on Carbon 3.0.0 has been released. Carbon 3.0.1 branch has been
>> created from the 3.0.0 branch. Next platform release will be based on this.
>>
>
> Why did we create a 3.0.1? Should we not do it from 3.0.0?
>

> The usual practice is not to branch again for patch releases. Rather we
> tag.
>

+1 for releasing Carbon 3.0.1 from the 3.0.0 branch. This is how we did all
the other Carbon releases.

Thanks
Sameera

> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
> Samisa Abeysinghe
> VP Engineering
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com
> http://wso2.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>


-- 
Sameera Jayasoma
Technical Lead
WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: same...@wso2.com
blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to