That is exactly what I was finally planning to do. So, resource resolution should be done inside my authz manager. I thought there was a neater way to do it.
Thanks, Danushka On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Amila Jayasekara <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to be you need to have a mapping with your rule and a resource > id. Cos in the permission model we authorize based on the resource id > (/x/y/z) etc ... I believe what you have given is only a single example. > Thus there can be many permutations? (like, name ending with Temp_ etc > ...). Can you explain all possible permutations for this ? Then we might > be able to come up with a resource id/resource id pattern which > correspond to your rules. > > Thankx > AmilaJ > > Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > > Hi devs, > > > > Inside my Carbon component I need to impose certain rules to restrict > > access to JMS objects. For an example I need to say something like "do > > not let user A create JMS queues that have names starting with Temp_". > > I can handle the rule language myself but how can I get the existing > > permission model to work with this?. I don't think the registry-based > > model would help as we do not have resources attached in this case. > > > > Thanks, > > Danushka > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Carbon-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
