Following are few additions that comes into my mind, not sure if you have enough capacity to cover them.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Ishani Ratnayake <[email protected]> wrote: > > Following are the Meeting Notes for ESB test review on Transports. We > should specially thank the ESB Team for being a part to identify gaps in > Testing. Follwoing were noted as gaps during the test review. > > - HTTP/Local/Relay Transports to be heavily tested > - For JMS transport test to be carry with Qpid, Apache ActiveMQ and one > other concentrating on > Most of the users are on Weblogic, MQSeries and SonicMQ. May be we need to cover them as well. > - Message Sizes and not the volume/Reliability > - Object Message Support > - Failure Cases (When the broker is down etc.) > - JMS Transactions > Make sure that the JMS provider implements XA aware connection factories. > - Smoke Test on Weblogic > - VFS to be tested varying the size of the file > size + various file types, XML, CSV etc.. Rajika > - Mail Transport focusing on; > - Error Handling > - Formatting/Content of the Mail > - Mails with headers > - FIX Transport using; > - Failure Cases (Formatting errors, mismatched sequence > numbers) > - Exposure to MBeans > - Message Store with JDBC > - FIX over SSL > - HTTP Transport with; > - IBM JDK > - Handling with different error conditions > - WSDL Processes > - HTTP 1.0 > - Methods (GET/POST/HEAD/PUT/DELETE/TRACE/OPTIONS/CONNECT?) > - JMX Matrices > > Thanks, > Ishani > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
