> Then why did you commit it? :). > OK. So, I was fixing the existing SQS kernal and Manjula too was doing some work (adding SQS error codes, authz, etc) on the same source. At some point I figured out that merging would become a nightmare if we continued to make changes and wanted to merge and commit stuff so that we both could continue the work without any hassle. The SQS module is still in its early days and I do not think anybody else uses it. Therefore I do not think a functionality glitch would be a major concern "at this point" unless there were any build breaks.
> As I remember Manjula also did a similar thing but we did not pick that > since there was those issues with that. > Yes. He did not get it right. The existing implementation (SQS kernal) is crappy and unstable. I will explain why it is so and why the model I suggested is the proper approach once I have ironed out those functional glitches. Thanks, Danushka
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
