----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Xue-Feng Yang <[email protected]>
To: Prabath Siriwardana <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, March 5, 2011 1:18:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in 
AuthorizationManager in carbon core


Good. 

Is there anything like user based role access control in wso2 middleware?

The meaning of user based role access control is:  In social network, any user 
can setup the access roles for people visiting his/her pages. For example, for 
common person: his/her family friends, work friends, classmates, sport  
teammates, and so on; or for an enterprise user: his/her team members, 
managers, 
upstream partners, downstream partners, and so on.  This role access control is 
only for one user's pages, not affects to other's pages.

It is different from the one I saw in those samples and docs.

Thanks,

Xue-Feng



________________________________
From: Prabath Siriwardana <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Xue-Feng Yang <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, March 5, 2011 12:58:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in 
AuthorizationManager in carbon core

User based authorization means - ability to assign a particular user a set of 
permission.

We have deprecated this support with role based access control. Every user 
belongs to a role and user inherits permissions from the  group he belongs to.

Thanks & regards,
-Prabath


On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Xue-Feng Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,
>
>
>What is the user based authorization you two talked about? I would like to 
>know 
>the current situation, docs, and samples on it.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Xue-Feng
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 5:41:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in 
>AuthorizationManager in carbon core
>
>
>SQS Autherization is user based. so we need user based autherization at the 
>carbon Autherization manager  level.
>
>thanks,
>Amila.
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Manjula Rathnayake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>>
>>In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based 
>>authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. 
>>
>>And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in 
>>new 
>>codes is can not be accepted. 
>>
>>
>>So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based 
>>authorization done.
>>Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are 
>>depreciated, 
>>they work fine.
>>
>>Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other 
>>suggestions 
>>on this, please.
>>
>>Thank you. 
>>
>>-- 
>>Manjula Rathnayaka
>>Software Engineer
>>WSO2, Inc.
>>Mobile:+94 77 743 1987
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Carbon-dev mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Carbon-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Prabath

http://blog.facilelogin.com
http://RampartFAQ.com

_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to