OK. Whatever it is, make it consistent.

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Pradeep Fernando <prad...@wso2.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> I prefer version.*  kind of naming. This what we added initially in
> the platform pom. this way, it provides better grouping.
>
> for an example, the orbit versions should go under,
>
> version.orbit. .....
>
> something like that.
>
> --Pradeep
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>



-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
*
*
*Member; Apache Software Foundation;
**http://www.apache.org/*<http://www.apache.org/>
*
email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 77 3320919
blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
*
*
*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to