How did you solve it in the servlet transport?

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:

> User. Realm.service may not solve this
> On Apr 7, 2011 3:38 PM, "Afkham Azeez" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, this method is what caused a huge performance issue in servlet
> > transport
> > On Apr 7, 2011 2:52 PM, "Danushka Menikkumbura" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Currently Qpid authorization plugin retrieves the user realm using
> >> registryService.getConfigUserRegistry().getUserRealm() which spends
> around
> >> 70% of the processing time. I am going to switch it to use the realm
> >> service. It should solve this issue.
> >>
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is it possible to disable eventing for the moment and get this to a
> >>> working state? Because we are blocked on everything because of this.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Supun..
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Danushka,
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> > [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Also if this particular call is costly we can optimise some of them.
> > But
> >>> I
> >>> >> think it is supposed to be used quite often. Isn't it?
> >>> >
> >>> > Yes. IMHO, the optimization could be done at the event-component
> level
> >>> > right, to avoid an unwanted call to Qpid. The publishers would
> generate
> >>> > events whenever some thing interesting happens and forward it to the
> >>> broker.
> >>> > These go through the event component which manages the brokering, and
> >>> then
> >>> > comes into Qpid for routing. So, if we could make the event component
> a
> >>> bit
> >>> > more intelligent to only forward messages to Qpid if needed (some
> form
> > of
> >>> > caching is needed), we should be able to avoid this right?
> >>> >
> >>> > WDYT?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Senaka.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Danushka
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Why 'registryService.getConfigUserRegistry().getUserRealm();'
> > getting
> >>> >>>> too long to respond? This is a widely used statement available on
> > unit
> >>> >>>> tests. Are those failing as well? If not, why is this happening
> > during
> >>> >>>> runtime only?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Yes. Senaka I think this is the issue that we need to address as I
> > can
> >>> >>> see.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Danushka
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Carbon-dev mailing list
> >>> >> [email protected]
> >>> >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Senaka Fernando
> >>> > Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> >>> > Associate Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> >>> > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> > E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> >>> > P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736; M: +94 77 322 1818
> >>> > Linked-In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
> >>> >
> >>> > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Carbon-dev mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Supun Kamburugamuva
> >>> Technical Lead & Product Manager, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
> >>> Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
> >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
> >>> E-mail: [email protected]; Mobile: +94 77 431 3585
> >>> Blog: http://supunk.blogspot.com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Carbon-dev mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Tharindu
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to