On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> In this case I had both IS and ESB running with default ports - >> >> >> In one machine how that is possible? I guess the problem is your ESB qpid >> has not started due to bind exception and at runtime it has connected to IS >> qpid server which uses a different access key. >> > > This is a serious usability issue. We need to re-think the approach of > using a JMS broker for any type of event distribution :-(. > > In the meantime, can you write a KB item for OT on "How to run multiple > Carbon 3.2.0 based products on a single machine" please? Maybe there are > other issues to sort out too but lets start documenting it so people won't > get hit by an obscure error. > Number of ports one has to change in order to run two carbon instances was a usability issue because the number of ports to be changed. We already had this discussion in carbon dev and come up with a parameter called offset (which is in the carbon.xml). The actual port number which carbon server binds == given port number in the configuration file + offset. so you can start many instances of carbon servers by just increasing the offset. thanks, Amila. > > BTW should the startup fail if this port can't be acquired?? > > Sanjiva. > -- > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1 > 650 265 8311 > blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ > > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
