On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe <[email protected]>wrote: > >> This is the conclusion from the discussion happened little while ago. >> >> As Amila mentioned, we can switch to in-memory storage from Qpid. But this >> has not been fully test. We will test this set up (in-memory) using BAM & >> then make the change permanent for 3.2.0. >> >> This way, each of the products will have a minimum impact from a code >> change perspective. >> > > One product can have only one broker. i.e if bam publisher in ESB wants to > use the in memory one, then all the other components, GReg, Deployment > synchronizer, publish mediator should use that. > ARGHHHHH. This is NOT going to work guys. Can we please reconvene and rehash the discussion? Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/ email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1 650 265 8311 blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
