Yeah. I'll change the orbit version. It's not much work. But I am not sure
if other's depend on qpid-client orbit.

Rajika

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Rajika,
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Yeah, that'll confuse the users. Let me check why it adds an extra 0.
>
> 3 digit version might be the correct thing. How about changing the
> orbit version? Is it too late? how much change is that?
>
> Shankar
>
> > Rajika
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > It should be qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v2.jar.
> >> >  When qpid-client-0.11.wso2v2.jar, bundle as a feature due to some
> >> > reason a
> >> > zero is suffices resulting  qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v2.jar. Both are
> same
> >> > jar.
> >>
> >> but, which one will be in public maven repo? I could not find
> >> qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v2.jar in the local maven repo.
> >>
> >> If I am writing a client, which jar I should use?
> >> qpid-client-0.11.wso2v2.jar is in maven repo, so I can use that, but
> >> products are shipping qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v2.jar. Isn't it a
> >> confusion to the user?
> >>
> >>  If bundling adds a 0, then shouldn't we have that as the orbit version?
> >>
> >> Shankar
> >>
> >> > Rajika
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> $subject
> >> >>
> >> >> some packs (e.g. appserver) are having qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v2.jar
> >> >> while some other packs(e.g MB) are having qpid-client-0.11.wso2v2.jar
> >> >>
> >> >> What should be the correct one?
> >> >>
> >> >> Shankar
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> S.Uthaiyashankar
> >> >> Senior Architect & Senior Manager
> >> >> WSO2 Inc.
> >> >> http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware"
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Carbon-dev mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Carbon-dev mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> S.Uthaiyashankar
> >> Senior Architect & Senior Manager
> >> WSO2 Inc.
> >> http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware"
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Carbon-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Carbon-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> S.Uthaiyashankar
> Senior Architect & Senior Manager
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware"
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to