Miyuru, Removing xalan seems to be breaking a lot of stuff. Are we using the latest xalan version? If not, can you put a new xalan version into the endorsed directory, and check the performance figures?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Miyuru Wanninayaka <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > During some performance tests done sometime back proved xalan lib we are > shipping with carbon products (comes through core/org.wso2.carbon.server) > is considerably slower than what Sun JVM provides. So just by removing > xalan jar, we can improve xslt performance. As tests done locally, seems > nothing gets break by doing this. If there is no objection i'll remove > xalan.jar from 3.2.3 release. > > -- > Thanks, > Miyuru > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > > -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * <http://www.apache.org/>** email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* * * *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
