On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote:
> The migrating from JUnit section tries to facilitate a migration with
> minimal code changes while still keeping the old test code. IMO, that may
> work in the short run, but since the integration tests have become messy,
> I'd advice against trying to preserve old code, but look at it from a fresh
> perspective, and do it right.

+1

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Nirmal Fernando <nir...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>> May be it's worth reading on "migrating from Junit section" (there's
>> an Eclipse plugin) [1] and an user experience on migration [2], if you
>> haven't referred to them yet.
>>
>> [1] http://testng.org/doc/migrating.html
>> [2]
>> http://www.opengamma.com/blog/2011/04/04/converting-opengamma-junit-testng
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Nuwan Wimalasekara <nuw...@wso2.com>
>> wrote:
>> > +1. TestNG has test  parameterization and  multi threading test
>> > execution.
>> > these features also can be used.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > NuwanW
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Folks,
>> >> I was playing around a bit with TestNG
>> >> (http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#introduction) & it seems
>> >> to
>> >> be the way to go for the type of integration testing we are doing. This
>> >> may
>> >> involve major changes at the platform testing level but will be worth
>> >> the
>> >> investment.
>> >>
>> >> Here are some articles that compare TestNG with JUnit4. We are using
>> >> JUnit
>> >> 3.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.mkyong.com/unittest/junit-4-vs-testng-comparison/
>> >> http://nelz.net/2010/10/06/testng-vs-junit4/
>> >>
>> >> I had a chat with Krishantha & he too agrees that TestNG is more
>> >> suitable
>> >> for the type of test automation we do. Does anybody have any concerns
>> >> regarding this move?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Afkham Azeez
>> >> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>> >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>> >>
>> >> email: az...@wso2.com cell: +94 77 3320919
>> >> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
>> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
>> >> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>> >>
>> >> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Architecture mailing list
>> >> architect...@wso2.org
>> >> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Carbon-dev mailing list
>> > Carbon-dev@wso2.org
>> > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> regards,
>> Nirmal
>>
>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Carbon-dev mailing list
>> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
>> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Afkham Azeez
> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>
> email: az...@wso2.com cell: +94 77 3320919
> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>



-- 

regards,
Nirmal

Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to