Had a quick offline chat with Anjana. Seems I misunderstood his response.
So, the current solution should fix $subject.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Kishanthan Thangarajah <kishant...@wso2.com
> wrote:

> Hi KasunG,
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:31 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Anjana Fernando <anj...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay, I've made quartz logs to WARN log level. This
>>> change is done in trunk. Also, in AS quartz dependency is coming from data
>>> services feature, which has scheduled tasks bundles with it, I'm going to
>>> separate out the data services task feature and only create a data services
>>> only feature, so when someone install the core data services feature, they
>>> won't get the scheduled tasks, which may not be required most of the time.
>>> If they want it, they can install it separately.
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK,  when logger level is INFO, it will also print WARN, and ERROR
>> level logs. So, I think the said solution does not address $subject.
>>
>
>  No, I think making the quartz log level to WARN will solve the $Subject
> as it will get rid of the INFO level messages. Also there is one big INFO
> level message from quartz which is their default behavior and all other
> messages are also INFO. So setting it to WARN level will remove those.
>
> Thanks,
> Kishanthan.
>
>
>> Quote: http://www.javaworld.com/jw-11-2000/jw-1122-log4j.html
>> log4j encourages the use of only four priorities: ERROR, WARN, INFO and
>> DEBUG, listed in decreasing order of priority.
>>
>> A logging request is said to be *enabled* if its priority is higher than
>> or equal to the priority of its category. Otherwise, the request is said to
>> be *disabled.*. A category without an assigned priority will inherit one
>> from the hierarchy.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Anjana.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Supun Malinga <sup...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>> This was said in earlier mails as well.
>>>> Anjana, any update on the matter?
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool} -  Job execution threads will use
>>>> class loader of thread: Framework Event Dispatcher
>>>>
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,031]  INFO
>>>>> {org.quartz.core.SchedulerSignalerImpl} -  Initialized Scheduler Signaller
>>>>> of type: class org.quartz.core.SchedulerSignalerImpl
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,032]  INFO {org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler} -
>>>>> Quartz Scheduler v.2.1.1 created.
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,033]  INFO {org.quartz.simpl.RAMJobStore} -
>>>>> RAMJobStore initialized.
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,034]  INFO {org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler} -
>>>>> Scheduler meta-data: Quartz Scheduler (v2.1.1) 'DefaultQuartzScheduler'
>>>>> with instanceId 'NON_CLUSTERED'
>>>>>   Scheduler class: 'org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler' - running locally.
>>>>>   NOT STARTED.
>>>>>   Currently in standby mode.
>>>>>   Number of jobs executed: 0
>>>>>   Using thread pool 'org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool' - with 10
>>>>> threads.
>>>>>   Using job-store 'org.quartz.simpl.RAMJobStore' - which does not
>>>>> support persistence. and is not clustered.
>>>>>
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,034]  INFO {org.quartz.impl.StdSchedulerFactory}
>>>>> -  Quartz scheduler 'DefaultQuartzScheduler' initialized from default
>>>>> resource file in Quartz package: 'quartz.properties'
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,034]  INFO {org.quartz.impl.StdSchedulerFactory}
>>>>> -  Quartz scheduler version: 2.1.1
>>>>> [2012-01-31 21:42:41,034]  INFO {org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler} -
>>>>> Scheduler DefaultQuartzScheduler_$_NON_CLUSTERED started.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Charitha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Charitha Kankanamge
>>>>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>>>>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com <http://wso2.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Supun Malinga,
>>>>
>>>> Software Engineer,
>>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>>> http://wso2.com
>>>> http://wso2.org
>>>> email - sup...@wso2.com <sup...@wso2.com>
>>>> mobile - 071 56 91 321
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Anjana Fernando*
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
>>> lean . enterprise . middleware
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Carbon-dev mailing list
>>> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
>>> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Kasun Gajasinghe*
>>
>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>
>> ,
>> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813*
>> *blog: **http://blog.kasunbg.org* <http://blog.kasunbg.org>
>>
>> *
>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Carbon-dev mailing list
>> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
>> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Kishanthan Thangarajah*
> Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> Mobile - +94773426635
> Blog - *http://kishanthan.wordpress.com*
> Twitter - *http://twitter.com/kishanthan*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>


-- 
*Kasun Gajasinghe*
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com

,
*email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813*
*blog: **http://blog.kasunbg.org* <http://blog.kasunbg.org>

*
twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>

*
*
_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to