Hi Sameera, Pradeep, +1, but X should probably be a name of a derivative/allotrope of Carbon (like Diamond or Graphite) which makes our code names more meaningful.
I really like the idea of having two-levels of dependencies and orbits very much, which simplifies the effort of doing a carbon release and sticking to that. Carbon must be just like the Linux kernel, and it can have its own release schedule. Please also note that carbon should continue to have a concept of service-stubs which can be reused by other components, and should also have an integration area. Thanks, Senaka. On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Pradeep Fernando <prad...@wso2.com> wrote: > +1 > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > Carbon-dev@wso2.org > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > > -- *Senaka Fernando* Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry; Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
