League Urges New York Members to Protest State Grant to Troublesome 
BPL Trial 

Pole-mounted Ambient BPL equipment in Briarcliff Manor, New York. 
[Alan Crosswell, N2YGK, Photo]
 

NEWINGTON, CT, Feb 2, 2006--ARRL Directors Frank Fallon, N2FF, of 
the Hudson Division and Bill Edgar, N3LLR, of the Atlantic Division 
have called on the League's New York membership to protest a state 
grant to help fund a problematic BPL pilot project. ARRL learned 
this week that the New York State Energy Research and Development 
Authority (NYSERDA) has contracted with electric utility 
Consolidated Edison (ConEd) and BPL manufacturer Ambient to provide 
up to $200,000 in funding for a BPL pilot in the Westchester County 
community of Briarcliff Manor. 

"If you share our dismay that NYSERDA's funds are being used to 
support a known source of radio spectrum pollution, write to Gov 
Pataki and NYSERDA President Peter Smith to demand that the State of 
New York use its influence to ensure that the Briarcliff Manor BPL 
project is either brought into compliance with the FCC rules 
immediately or shut down," Fallon and Edgar said in a joint 
statement to New York ARRL members. 

The Briarcliff Manor project has been the subject of a string of 
complaints to the FCC, including several requests from the ARRL--the 
last filed just last month--to shut down the project until it 
complies with FCC rules. 

Fallon and Edgar called on ARRL members in the Empire State to write 
Gov George E. Pataki, State Capitol, Albany, NY 12224 and Peter R. 
Smith, President, NYSERDA, 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY 12203-
6399. Pataki is a former Amateur Radio licensee, K2ZCZ (since 
reissued). 

ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, points out that the League's concerns 
regarding the public grant have been on record with NYSERDA since 
June 2004, when Ambient prematurely announced a funding grant. 
Sumner said John Love, the NYSERDA project manager for the BPL 
grant, this week confirmed that a contract had been signed. 

"I shared with him our disappointment at Ambient's involvement, 
given their miserable track record in Briarcliff Manor," Sumner 
said. In his conversation with Love, Sumner said he explained that 
Ambient was violating FCC rules in Briarcliff Manor by exceeding 
Part 15 emission limits, causing harmful interference in the amateur 
bands and failing to post required information in the public BPL 
system database. 

Love "clearly didn't know much about the interference issue," Sumner 
said, adding that the official indicated NYSERDA's interest in BPL 
was as a means to improve the quality of electric power 
delivery. "However, he said the contract requires the parties to 
monitor and report on interference and its mitigation," Sumner 
noted. "I offered ARRL's technical resources to educate him." 

Long History of Complaints 

On January 5, citing FCC inaction in response to previous 
complaints, the ARRL renewed its complaint to the Commission about 
the Ambient Corporation BPL project in Briarcliff Manor. The BPL 
system uses power lines owned and operated by ConEd under a Part 5 
Experimental FCC authorization. The League requested last month that 
the FCC instruct the BPL facility's operators to shut it down 
immediately and not resume operation until it can demonstrate full 
compliance with all applicable FCC rules. 

NOTE: The ARRL NYSERDA Correspondence file can be found here. (All 
files are in PDF format.)
 
 

A 25-page engineering report that accompanied the League's complaint 
detailed measurements that ARRL Laboratory Manager Ed Hare, W1RFI, 
made early last December in Briarcliff Manor. 

"ARRL has repeatedly found in past measurements at the site that the 
system operates with radiated emission levels strong enough to cause 
widespread harmful interference to the Amateur Radio Service," the 
League said in early January. "It has also found on several 
occasions that parts of the system were operating at levels 
exceeding the emission limits for BPL systems operating under Part 
15 of the Commission's rules." 

The League's engineering survey indicated that "notching" Ambient 
previously reported to have done was not in place and that, at 
several locations, the BPL system "was operating at or near the FCC 
emission limits in the amateur bands, causing strong interference." 

League Raises Question of NYSERDA Funding Propriety 

When Con Ed and Ambient first announced the NYSERDA funding award in 
June 2004, the grant had not actually been made. The misleading news 
release--headlined "NYSERDA Awards Ambient and Con Edison Funding 
for Enhancing PLC Pilot Project"--was never corrected or retracted, 
however. Acting on the belief that NYSERDA was already providing 
money for the project, the League wrote NYSERDA in September 2004 
and again in March 2005 to document the ongoing interference. 

Gunnar Walmet, NYSERDA's director of industry research and 
buildings, responded in March 2005 that the Authority still had not 
been able to complete the contract. Sumner wrote back to reiterate 
that the reason for the League's June 2004 letter was "to raise the 
question of whether a project that was in willful violation of the 
Communications Act was deserving of public funding." Sumner told 
Walmet that not only does the original question remain, it's now 
joined by another: "Whether corporations that make such 
misrepresentations are qualified to receive public funding." 

Additional information about BPL and Amateur Radio is on the ARRL 
Web site. To support the League's efforts in this area, visit the 
ARRL's secure Spectrum Defense Web site. 








K3UK DX Cluster via telnet://cluster.dnyalias.org

Other K3UK-CARC Groups
DIGITALRADIO Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
MixW Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/

Unsubscribe this group via [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/carcomm/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to